There is a lot of separation amongst Gaza and the Nile

There is a lot of separation amongst Gaza and the Nile, nonetheless if you somehow happened to take a gander at a topological guide of the territory you would see that the sloping precipitous topography of Israel moves to the much lower level Nile River Valley in the general region of Gaza. History specialists report that Ramesses VI willfully brings his strengths out of Canaan amid his rule. As indicated by The Fourth Day: Why The Bible is Historically Accurate Chronology the Israelites crossed the Jordan River to start their triumph of Canaan ahead of schedule in the rule of Ramesses VII. Accepting there exists just a little blunder in the Conventional Egyptian Chronology, I trust the Israelites really terrified Ramesses VI out of Canaan once again into Egypt not long after they entered Canaan. What is fascinating about this is the Bible never specifies Israel skirmishing Egypt. Archeologists have discovered confirmation that Ramesses VI pulled back his strengths from Canaan. Actually Egypt is never said in the Bible from the book of Exodus till the rule of Solomon. It is very conceivable that Egypt saw the extent of Israel's armed force and withdrew, in this manner clarifying why it wasn't recorded in the Bible. Egypt's withdraw is huge since Egypt frequently utilized Canaan as a "cushion zone" to anticipate other capable countries like the Hittites, the Babylonians and the Assyrians from attacking Egypt. Subsequently, not exclusively was Egypt militarily powerless it was additionally gotten between three impressive countries, Libya toward the west, Ethiopia toward the south (this incorporates display day Sudan) and Israel toward the east. I trust that for the following three hundred years Egypt was fixed in with minimal opportunity to recuperate its previous eminence.

The Dark Ages of the Eastern Mediterranean

Egyptologists have been unshakable that the 30 traditions of Egypt tailed one behind the other with no crevice in the timetable between these rulers. Is there any authentic proof that backings Egypt did not have a Pharaoh from 1200 B.C. to 900 B.C.? Consider the way that essentially every country in the Eastern Mediterranean experienced some dull age, some period without a record of its history amid this time. Antiquarians assert that antiquated Greece experienced a dull age from twelfth to the eighth century B.C. between the Mycenean and Archaic Greek human advancements. The Hittites seemed to have a dull age from the thirteenth to the tenth century B.C. Indeed, even the Assyrians seemed to have a dim age of one hundred years from 1000-900 B.C. So if all these neighboring countries of Egypt encountered a dull age period amid this time is there any good reason why egypt shouldn't?

Likewise consider that the Greeks insinuated a dull time of Egypt too. Greek mythology says a lord of Egypt, Proteus, who moved toward becoming ruler of Egypt after a period where Egypt did not have a lord for five eras (Reference: Greek Mythology Link, creator Carlos Parada. In the event that we expect an era was a time of 60 years then five eras would be 300 years; unquestionably a plausibility. So who is Proteus lord of Egypt? As per Greek mythology Proteus was lord of Egypt amid the Trojan War when Paris, sovereign of Troy, arrived at the shores of Egypt with his hostage Helen. Obviously Paris had hijacked Helen, the ruler of Sparta. This is the episode that started the Trojan War. Herodotus likewise says Proteus in his book The Histories as to his part in the Trojan War. On the off chance that Proteus is the ruler of Egypt amid the Trojan War and on the grounds that he is the lord toward the finish of the 300 year time of hush in Egyptian history then the Trojan War more likely than not happened extremely close to 900 B.C. as indicated by the Fourth Day: Why the Bible is Historically Accurate Chronology. Since it was the Mycenean Greeks that attacked Troy then it is extremely conceivable there was a steady transform from the Mycenean to the Archaic Greek progress over a time of one hundred years (900-800 B.C.) This basically implies there was no dim age in antiquated Greece as has been so commandingly contended by Peter James in his book Centuries of Darkness.

So where is the addition point for this 300 year time of hush in the Conventional Egyptian Chronology? Since this period happens some place in time between the twentieth and 21st administrations of antiquated Egypt then the principal lord after this 300 year time of quiet should be in one of these lines. Additionally the main effective lord in Egypt in 300 years would most likely make some declaration or proclamation that would exhibit that Egypt at the end of the day was responsible for its own particular predetermination.